联合国危险货物运输专家委员会（TDG）第41次会议提案32
[ 打印 ]
Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods and on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals
Sub-Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods
Forty-first session
Geneva, 25 June – 4 July 2012
Item 5 (c) of the provisional agenda
Miscellaneous proposals of amendments to the
Model Regulations on the Transport of Dangerous goods: marking and labelling
Proposals for amendments to the descriptions of labels, placards, symbols, markings and marks
Transmitted by the expert from the United Kingdom
Background and discussion
1. The expert from the United Kingdom presents revised proposals for the standardisation of marks/labels/placards based on the discussions of ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2011/5 and ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2011/32 at the 39th and 40th sessions of the Sub-Committee. A number of the comments received have been incorporated into this paper.
2. In addition, this paper incorporates proposals to editorially amend the fumigation warning mark and coolant/conditioning unit warning mark previously presented in paper ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2011/31. The minimum overall dimensions will remain too small to allow the necessary lettering. As discussed at the meeting, this should not cause practical problems because users can make the marks larger than the minimum size. However, once it is known what minimum size is used by industry, the minimum overall sizes should be enlarged for the sake of having logically consistent provisions.
3. During the 40th session, there was a discussion about specifying a reduction in the size of certain labels to allow for print bleeds. The expert from Belgium noted that certain labels such as Division 4.1 labels already had printing to the edge of a label without complaint. The label industry was invited to submit further information on the printing requirements for labels. In the absence of such comments at the time of writing, the reduction in size of certain markings is not included in this paper.
4. Some experts expressed the wish to have specified design tolerances for labels. The expert from the United Kingdom is reluctant to do so as this would blur what is meant by a minimum size. As argued before, stating minimum dimensions allows an unlimited tolerance for larger than required markings. Allowing a tolerance on the minimum size is merely stating a minimum size in a more complex way. To illustrate this point, allowing a minimum size of 100 mm with a 1% tolerance is simply a more complex way of stating an absolute minimum size of 99 mm. Adding tolerances defeats the objective of clarifying what is required from industry. Given that the most widely used markings are produced by professional graphic designers and that a long transitional period is envisaged, this ought not to be an onerous requirement.
5. The concern has also been expressed that adding text “all features shall be in proportion to those shown” might attract inappropriate enforcement action relating to the exact proportions of certain features of markings (such as flames, trees or fish). Amending this to include the term “approximate” might introduce vagueness to exactly specified features such as overall size. The United Kingdom therefore proposes to avoid this problem by stating “where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown”. The word “approximate” should be translatable without a loss of meaning or nuance. Please note that this does not apply to proposal 4 (orientation arrows) where no dimensions are specified; this proposed text remains unchanged. In proposal 7 for placards, this text is contained in the referenced paragraph 5.2.2.2.1.1 for labels.
6. A proposal to add specifications for the mark in P904 is included. This follows the same model as proposed for P650.
7. Where diagrams are referred to in the body of the proposed text, they are referred to by figure numbers in all cases rather than stating “below”.
8. In this paper, the text is shown as proposed without strikethroughs or underlining to show where the existing text is amended. This is to aid clarity where many small editorial changes have been made. Full explanations of all the editorial amendments can be found in the previous papers on this subject.
Proposal 1: Limited quantity marking
9. The United Kingdom proposes a revised version of the amended description for the Limited Quantity marking. The size is now defined as a minimum of 100 mm x 100 mm (50 mm x 50 mm for reduced size markings) and the figure number is referenced in the text.
10. Amend sections 3.4.7 and 3.4.8 and insert new paragraphs 3.4.7.1, 3.4.7.2, 3.4.8.1 and 3.4.8.2 as follows:
“3.4.7 Marking for packages containing limited quantities
3.4.7.1 Except for air transport, packages containing dangerous goods in limited quantities shall bear the marking shown in Figure 3.4.1:
Figure 3.4.1
Marking for packages containing limited quantities
The marking shall be readily visible, legible and able to withstand open weather exposure without a substantial reduction in effectiveness.
The marking shall be in the form of a square set at an angle of 45 degrees (diamond-shaped). The top and bottom portions and the surrounding line shall be black. The centre area shall be white or a suitable contrasting background. The minimum dimensions shall be 100 mm x 100 mm and the minimum width of line forming the diamond shall be 2 mm. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.
3.4.7.2 If the size of the package so requires, the minimum outer dimensions shown in Figure 3.4.1 may be reduced to be not less than 50 mm x 50 mm provided the marking remains clearly visible. The minimum width of the line forming the diamond may be reduced to a minimum of 1 mm.
3.4.8 Marking for packages containing limited quantities conforming to Part 3, Chapter 4 of the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air.
3.4.8.1 Packages containing dangerous goods packed in conformity with the provisions of Part 3, Chapter 4 of the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Transport of Dangerous Goods may bear the marking shown in Figure 3.4.2 to certify conformity with these provisions:
Figure 3.4.2
Marking for packages containing limited quantities conforming to Part 3, Chapter 4 of the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
The marking shall be readily visible, legible and able to withstand open weather exposure without a substantial reduction in effectiveness.
The marking shall be in the form of a square set at an angle of 45 degrees (diamond-shaped). The top and bottom portions and the surrounding line shall be black. The centre area shall be white or a suitable contrasting background. The minimum dimensions shall be 100 mm x 100 mm and the minimum width of line forming the diamond shall be 2 mm. The symbol "Y" shall be placed in the centre of the mark and shall be clearly visible. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.
3.4.8.2 If the size of the package so requires, the minimum outer dimensions shown in Figure 3.4.2 may be reduced to be not less than 50 mm x 50 mm provided the marking remains clearly visible. The minimum width of the line forming the diamond may be reduced to a minimum of 1 mm. The symbol "Y" shall remain in approximate proportion to that shown in Figure 3.4.2.”
Proposal 2: Excepted quantity mark
11.No changes to the text of 3.5.4.3 are proposed, but the paragraph is repositioned below Figure 3.5.1. Please note that the text in 3.5.4.1 is retained without amendment.
12. Amend 3.5.4.2 and 3.5.4.3 to read as follows:
“3.5.4.2 Figure 3.5.1
Excepted quantities mark
* The Class or, when assigned, the Division number(s) shall be shown in this location.
** The name of the consignor or of the consignee shall be shown in this location if not shown elsewhere on the package.
The marking shall be in the form of a square. The hatching and symbol shall be of the same colour, black or red, on white or suitable contrasting background. The minimum dimensions shall be 100 mm x 100 mm. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.
3.5.4.3 An overpack containing dangerous goods in excepted quantities shall display the markings required by 3.5.4.1, unless such markings on packages within the overpack are clearly visible.”
Proposal 3: Environmentally hazardous substance mark
13. Delete the existing paragraph 5.2.1.6.3 and Figure 5.2.2 and replace with a new paragraph 5.2.1.6.3 and Figure 5.2.2 as follows:
“5.2.1.6.3 The environmentally hazardous substance mark shall be as shown in
Figure 5.2.2.
Environmentally hazardous substance mark
The marking shall be in the form of a square set at an angle of 45 degrees (diamond-shaped). The symbol (fish and tree) shall be black on white or suitable contrasting background. The minimum dimensions shall be 100 mm x 100 mm and the minimum width of line forming the diamond shall be 2 mm. If the size of the package so requires, the dimensions/line thickness may be reduced, provided the marking remains clearly visible. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.
NOTE: The labelling provisions of 5.2.2 apply in addition to any requirement for packages to bear the environmentally hazardous substance mark.”
14. Add a new paragraph 5.3.2.3.2 as follows:
“5.3.2.3.2 The environmentally hazardous substance mark for cargo transport units shall be as described in 5.2.1.6.3 and Figure 5.2.2, except that the minimum dimensions shall be 250 mm x 250 mm. The minimum width of line forming the diamond shall be 5 mm.
Proposal 4: Orientation arrows
15. The orientation arrows in paragraph 5.2.1.7.1 have no specified dimensions. This proposal does not intend to add any, other than to ensure that the arrows remain in proportion. Also, it is proposed to add a figure number to the diagrams for editorial neatness, with a view to Proposal 5 which proposes to add a new Figure 5.2.5.
“Figure 5.2.3 Figure 5.2.4
or
Two black or red arrows on white or suitable contrasting background.
The rectangular border is optional
All features shall be in proportion to those shown.”
Proposal 5: Class/division labels
16. This proposal specifies that the measurement from the edge of the label to the line inside the edge be measured to the outside of that line. The expert from the United Kingdom notes that is the current measurement used on label samples that have been examined, but is open to altering this part of the proposal if preferred. Please note that 5.2.2.2.1, 5.2.2.2.1.2 to 5.2.2.2.1.7 and 5.2.2.2.2 remains unaltered.
17. Delete the existing 5.2.2.2.1.1 and replace with a new sub-paragraph 5.2.2.2.1.1, Figure 5.2.5 and insert a new paragraph 5.2.2.2.1.8 as follows:
“5.2.2.2.1.1 Labels shall be configured as shown in Figure 5.2.5. Labels shall be displayed on a background of contrasting colour, or shall have either a dotted or solid outer boundary line.
Figure 5.2.5
Class/division label
* Class or division number shall be shown in this location in the bottom corner.
** The class or division symbol/numeral/text shall be shown in this location.
5.2.2.2.1.8If the size of the package so requires the dimensions may be reduced, provided the marking remains clearly visible. The line inside the edge shall remain 5 mm to the edge of the label. The minimum width of the line inside the edge shall remain 2 mm. Dimensions for cylinders shall comply with 5.2.2.2.1.2.
The label shall be in the form of a square set at an angle of 45 degrees (diamond-shaped). The minimum dimensions shall be 100 mm x 100 mm and the minimum width of the line inside the edge forming the diamond shall be 2 mm. The line inside the edge shall be parallel and 5 mm from the outside of that line to the edge of the label. The line inside the edge on the upper half of the label shall be the same colour as the symbol and the line inside the edge on the lower half of the label shall be the same colour as the class or division number in the bottom corner. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.”
Class/division placards (not Class 7)
18. Both these alternative proposals have been revised in a similar way to proposal 5 to make the outer edge of the inner line the point of measurement. Likewise, the UK is open to amending this part of the proposal if this is the will of the UN Sub-Committee.
Proposal 6
19. The description follows that proposed for class/division labels as closely as possible. To avoid altering the logical structure of the provisions, some references to labels remain in the descriptive text. The diagram is marked “Figure 5.3.0” to avoid complex consequential amendments.
20. Delete the existing paragraph 5.3.1.2.1 and replace with a new paragraph 5.3.1.2.1 as follows:
"5.3.1.2.1 Except as provided in 5.3.1.2.2 for the Class 7 placard, a placard shall be configured as shown in Figure 5.3.0.
Figure 5.3.0
Placard (except for class 7)
The placard shall be in the form of a square set at an angle of 45 degrees (diamond-shaped). The minimum dimensions shall be 250 mm x 250 mm (to the edge of the placard) and the minimum width of the line inside the edge forming the diamond shall be 5 mm. The line inside the edge shall be parallel and 12.5 mm from the outside of that line to the edge of the placard. The symbol and line inside the edge shall correspond in colour to the label for the class or division of the dangerous goods in question. The class or division symbol/numeral shall be positioned and sized in proportion to those prescribed in 5.2.2.2 for the corresponding class or division of the dangerous goods in question. The placard shall display the number of the class or division (and for goods in Class 1, the compatibility group letter) of the dangerous goods in question in the manner prescribed in 5.2.2.2 for the corresponding label, in digits not less than 25 mm high. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown."
Proposal 7
21. Delete paragraph 5.3.1.2.1 and replace with a new paragraph 5.3.1.2.1 as follows:
“5.3.1.2.1 Except as provided in 5.3.1.2.2 for the Class 7 placard, a placard shall follow the provisions of paragraphs 5.2.2.2.1 and 5.2.2.2.2 for the label of the class or division of the dangerous goods in question except:
(a) The minimum dimensions shall be 250 mm x 250 mm (to the edge of the placard) and the minimum width of the line inside the edge forming the diamond shall be 5 mm. The line inside the edge shall be parallel and 12.5 mm from the outside of that line to the edge of the placard.
(b) The class or division number (and for goods in Class 1, the compatibility group letter) of the dangerous goods in question shall have digits not less than 25 mm high.”
22. As a consequential amendment, the final sentence of 5.3.1.1.2 could be deleted as this duplicates text for labels in 5.2.2.2.1 which is referenced for placards in 5.3.1.2.1.
Proposal 8: Elevated temperature substance mark
23. In 5.3.2.2, amend the text and to read as follows:
“5.3.2.2 Elevated temperature substances
Cargo transport units containing a substance that is transported or offered for transport in a liquid state at a temperature equal to or exceeding 100 °C, in a solid state at a temperature equal to or exceeding 240 °C shall bear on each side and on each end the mark shown in Figure 5.3.4.
Figure 5.3.4
Mark for carriage at elevated temperature
The marking shall be an equilateral triangle. The colour of the mark shall be red. The minimum dimension of the sides shall be 250 mm. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.”
Proposal 9: IBC and large packaging stacking load symbols
24. The proposal for stacking load symbols is clarified to make clear that the area within the printer’s marks should be square. This would ensure that the symbols remain in proportion. For situations where the printer’s marks are not printed on to an IBC or large packaging, the requirement for the symbol to be in proportion to 100 mm as shown in the example diagram gives an indication of the minimum required size. From a practical point of view, printers have the discretion to increase the size used to ensure the marking is large enough when printing the symbols without a printer’s mark. The United Kingdom is reluctant to specify the dimensions of the symbols themselves due to the complexity involved in doing so. This would also change recently adopted approach from the 17th revised edition of the Model Regulations.
25. Amend 6.5.2.2.2 to read as follows:
"6.5.2.2.2 The maximum permitted stacking load applicable when the IBC is in use shall be displayed on a symbol as shown in Figure 6.5.1 or Figure 6.5.2. The symbol shall be durable and clearly visible.
Figure 6.5.1 Figure 6.5.2
IBCs capable of being stacked IBCs NOT capable of being stacked
The minimum dimensions shall be 100 mm x 100 mm. The letters and numbers indicating the mass shall be at least 12 mm high. The area within the printer’s marks indicated by the dimensional arrows shall be square. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.”
26. Amend 6.6.3.3.3 to read as follows:
"6.6.3.3 The maximum permitted stacking load applicable when the large packaging is in use shall be displayed on a symbol as shown in Figure 6.6.1 or Figure 6.6.2. The symbol shall be durable and clearly visible.
Figure 6.6.1 Figure 6.6.2
Large packagings capable of being stacked Large packagings NOT capable of being stacked
The minimum dimensions shall be 100 mm x 100 mm. The letters and numbers indicating the mass shall be at least 12 mm high. The area within the printer’s marks indicated by the dimensional arrows shall be square. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown. The mass marked above the symbol shall not exceed the load imposed during the design type test (see 6.6.5.3.3.4) divided by 1.8.
NOTE: The provisions of 6.6.3.3 shall apply to all large packagings manufactured, repaired or remanufactured as from 1 January 2015.”
Proposal 10: Mark shown in Packing Instructions P650 and P904
27. Amend the diagram in P650 as follows (overall size of diagram increased to allow for the size of dimensions lettering/arrows):
28. Amend the diagram in P904 as follows (overall size of diagram increased to allow for the size of dimensions lettering/arrows):
Proposal 11: Fumigation warning mark
29. The fumigation warning mark already has dimensional arrows. This proposal is to align the description of the mark with the wording found for other marks. The line width is specified as with the limited quantity marking.
30. Amend 5.5.2.3.2 and Figure 5.5.1 to read as follows:
“5.5.2.3.2 The fumigation warning mark shall be as shown in Figure 5.5.1.
Figure 5.5.1
* Insert details as appropriate.
Fumigation warning mark
The marking shall be a rectangle. The minimum dimensions shall be 300 mm wide x 250 mm high and the minimum width of the outer line shall be 2 mm. The marking shall be in black print on a white background with lettering not less than 25 mm high. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.”
Proposal 12: Coolant/conditioning unit warning mark
31.For clarity and tidiness, the proper shipping name is specified to fit on only one line. The same applies to the “AS COOLANT”/“AS CONDITIONER” text below it.
32. This paper proposes to make alterations to the artwork in Figure 5.5.2 by increasing the size of the lettering of “WARNING” to be in proportion to the overall dimension. Printer’s marks are also added to the bottom corners to aid clarity. The wording on the dimensional arrows is aligned to the other proposals in this text. Paragraph 5.5.3.6.2 is restructured to be aligned with the proposal for the fumigation warning mark.
33. Delete the existing paragraph 5.5.3.6.2 and replace with a new paragraph 5.5.3.6.2 to read as follows:
5.5.3.6.2 The warning mark shall be as shown in Figure 5.5.2
Figure 5.5.2
Coolant/conditioning warning mark for cargo transport units
* Insert proper shipping name of the coolant/conditioner. The lettering shall be in capitals, all be on one line and shall be at least 25 mm high. If the length of the proper shipping name is too long to fit in the space provided, the lettering may be reduced to the maximum size possible to fit. For example: CARBON DIOXIDE, SOLID.
** Insert “AS COOLANT” or “AS CONDITIONER” as appropriate. The lettering shall be in capitals, all be on one line and be at least 25 mm high.
The marking shall be a rectangle. The minimum dimensions shall be 150 mm wide x 250 mm high. The word “WARNING” shall be in red or white and be at least 25 mm high. Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.”
Transitional measures
34. The expert from the United Kingdom agrees with the view that a long transitional period is required to allow the running down of any existing stocks of markings. The United Kingdom would view a transitional date of 1 January 2017 for application through modal regulations as being appropriate. However, the United Kingdom has no firm view on the exact date.
Guiding principles
35. The expert from the United Kingdomreceived support at the 41st session for adding text to the Guiding Principles of the Model Regulations. If the proposals in this paper are adopted, then the expert from the United Kingdomwould be prepared to propose text at a later session.
联合国危险货物运输专家和全球化学品统一分类和标签制度专家委员会
危险货物运输专家分委员会
第四十一次会议
日内瓦, 2012年6月25日-7月4日
议程第5 (c)项
对规章范本的各种修正草案：标识和标签
关于标签、揭示牌、符号、标记和标识描述的修订提案
由英国专家提交
背景和讨论
1. 英国专家基于在39 次和40 次分委员会会议上对ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2011/5 和 ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2011/32的讨论提交了本份标记/标签/揭示牌的修订提案。许多收到的修订建议已加入本文件。
2. 另外，本文件包含了对之前ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2011/31所提出的熏蒸警告标识及冷却剂/调节装置警告标识的编辑性修订。最小总尺寸将保持足够小来容纳必要的文字。如会议所讨论，这不会导致实际问题因为使用者可以使标签大于最小尺寸。然而，一旦最小尺寸被行业应用，最小总尺寸为了条款的逻辑一致性应该扩大。
3. 在40次会议上，关于规定对某些标签减小尺寸来允许印刷留白进行了讨论。比利时专家提出如4.1项的某些标签已经印刷了标签边缘并且没有被抱怨。标签行业被邀请来提出更多关于标签印刷的需求。写本提案的时候没有这类的意见，因此对减小某些标签尺寸的内容未加入到本文件中。
4. 一些专家表达了关于描述标签设计公差的愿望。英国专家不愿意这样做因为这将导致最小尺寸意义的模糊。正如以前所讨论的，指定的最小尺寸允许有无限的公差可以大于所要求的标记。允许最小尺寸公差仅仅让规定最小尺寸变得更复杂。要说明这一点，允许最小尺寸100mm有1%公差只是规定绝对最小尺寸是99mm的更复杂的一种说法。加入公差达不到行业所要求进行澄清的目的。考虑到最广泛使用的标签是由专业的图形设计者制造并且会有很长的过渡期，这不应该是一个困难的要求。
5. 有人表达了焦虑，对于加入文本“所有特征应与图示成比例”可能会造成对某些标记特征（如火焰，树和鱼）也要不合适的强制要求其成比例。修订加入了词“大概”也许可以稍微模糊一点来确切如总尺寸等特征。英国因此建议通过规定“如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例”来回避此问题。词“大概”应被翻译不可遗漏。请注意这条不应用于提议4（方向箭头），因为它没有描述尺寸，该提议文本保持未变。在对揭示牌的提议7中，这段文字包含在对标签的5.2.2.2.1.1段中。
6. 本文包含了增加对P904的标记说明的提议。与对P650提议的模板相同。
7. 当提议文本内容中引用图表时，它们引用图号而不是描述“如下”。
8. 在本文中，所提议文本没有删除线或下划线来表示对现行文本的修订。这有助于清楚做出的很多小的编辑性修订。所有编辑性修订的解释可以在之前的文件中找到。
提议1: 有限数量标记
9. 英国建议修订对于有限数量标记的版本表述。尺寸现在定义为最小为100 mm x 100 mm（50 mm x 50 mm为减小尺寸的标记）且图号参见文本。
10. 修订3.4.7和3.4.8并加入新段落3.4.7.1, 3.4.7.2, 3.4.8.1 和 3.4.8.2如下：
“3.4.7 内装有限数量货物包装件的标记
3.4.7.1 除空运外，含有限数量危险货物的包装件应有图3.4.1所示标记：
图 3.4.1
有限数量包装件标记
标记必须显而易见，清晰，并能承受露天暴露而不明显减低效果。
标记应该是一个呈45度角放置的正方形(菱形)。 上下部分和边线应为黑色，中心区域为白色或适当反差底色. 最小尺寸为100 mm x100 mm且菱形边的最小宽度应为2mm。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。
3.4.7.2 如包装件的大小需要，图 3.4.1所示最小外部尺寸可缩小，但不得小于 50 mmx 50 mm，且标记仍必须清晰可见。菱形边的宽度最小可减至1mm。
3.4.8 有限数量包装件的标记应符合国际民航组织《危险品航空安全运输技术细则》第4 章第3部分。
3.4.8.1 提交空运的内装危险货物的包装件按国际民航组织《危险品航空安全运输技术细则》第4 章第3部分的规定应有图3.4.2所示标记：
图 3.4.2
符合国际民航组织《危险品航空安全运输技术细则》第4 章第3部分的有限数量包装件标记
标记必须显而易见，清晰，并能承受露天暴露而不明显减低效果。
标记应该是一个呈45度角放置的正方形(菱形)。上下部分和边线应为黑色，中心区域为白色或适当反差底色。最小尺寸为100 mm x 100 mm ，菱形边的最小宽度为2 mm。 符号“Y”置于标记中央，须清晰可见。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。
3.4.8.2 如包装件的大小需要，图 3.4.2所示最小外部尺寸可缩小，但不得小于50 mm x 50 mm ，且标记仍必须清晰可见。菱形边的宽度最小可减至1 mm。 符号“Y” 应保持如图 3.4.2所示比例。”
提议2: 例外数量标记
11. 提案没有针对3.5.4.3文本的改变，但该段落重新放置在图3.5.1之下。请注意3.5.4.1中的文本保留未修订。
12. 修订3.5.4.2和3.5.4.3如下：
“3.5.4.2
图 3.5.1
例外数量标记
* 此处显示分类，或如果已经指定，显示类项编号。
** 如果包装件没有在其他位置显示发货人或收货人的姓名，则在此处显示。
标记应为正方形。影线和符号使用同一颜色，黑或红，底为白色或适当反差底色。 最小尺寸为100 mm x100 mm。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。
3.5.4.3 装有例外数量危险货物的合成包装件，也应有3.5.4.1所要求的标记，除非可以清楚地看到合成包装内包装件上的标记。”
提议3:危害环境物质标记
13. 删除现行段落5.2.1.6.3 和图 5.2.2 并用新段落5.2.1.6.3 和图 5.2.2 替换如下：
“5.2.1.6.3 危害环境物质标记如图 5.2.2所示。
图 5.2.2
危害环境物质标记
标记应是一个以45度角放置的正方形(菱形) 。符号(鱼和树)应为黑色白底或适当的反差底色。最小尺寸应为100 mm x 100 mm且菱形边的最小宽度应为 2 mm。如包装件的大小需要，可缩小尺寸/线宽，但标记仍必须清晰可见。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。
注: 5.2.2的标签条款适用于任何带有危害环境物质标记的包装件。”
14. 增加新段5.3.2.3.2 如下：
“5.3.2.3.2 货物运输单元的危害环境物质标记应如5.2.1.6.3 和 图 5.2.2所描述，除了最小尺寸应是 250 mm x 250 mm。最小菱形线宽为5 mm。”
提议4: 方向箭头
15. 图5.2.1.7.1中的方向箭头没有规定尺寸。本提议不想增加任何东西来保证方向箭头的比例。同样，建议为了编辑效果如提议5中建议增加新图5.2.5那样增加图表中的图号。
“图 5.2.3 图 5.2.4
或
两个黑色或红色箭头，
底色：白色或适当的反衬颜色
所有特征应与图示成比例。”
提议5: 类别/项别标签
16. 本提议确认标签边缘到边缘内线的测量是测到那条线的外部。英国专家指出现在用于标签样本的测量已被检查过，但如果有意愿也可进行改变。请注意5.2.2.2.1, 5.2.2.2.1.2到 5.2.2.2.1.7 和 5.2.2.2.2保持未变。
17. 删除现有 5.2.2.2.1.1并 用新小段 5.2.2.2.1.1和图5.2.5代替，且插入新段5.2.2.2.1.8 如下：
“5.2.2.2.1.1 标签应如图 5.2.5所示。标签必须展示在反差底色上，或者用虚线或实线标出外缘。
图 5.2.5
类别/项别 标签
* 类号或项号应在底角位置显示。
** 类别或项别符号/数字/文本应在此位置显示。
5.2.2.2.1.8如包装件的大小需要，尺寸可缩小，但标记仍必须清晰可见。边缘内线应与标签边缘保持5mm。边缘内线最小宽度应保持2mm。气瓶尺寸应符合5.2.2.2.1.2。
标签应该是一个呈45度角的正方形(菱形) ，4条边长相同。最小尺寸为 100 mm x 100 mm且菱形边的内线最小宽度应为2mm。边缘内线应和标记边缘平行且距离5 mm。 标签上半部的内线的颜色应与符号相同，下半部的内线应与底角的类号或项号颜色相同。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。”
类号/项号 揭示牌 (非第7类)
18. 这两种改变的提议已用类似于提议5的方式修订，确认内线的外边缘为测量点。同样，如果是联合国分委员会的意愿，英国愿开放修订此部分提议。
提议6
19. 描述尽量遵循对类别/项别标签的提议，为了防止改变条款的逻辑结构，一些标签的参考依旧在描述文本中。编号“图5.3.0”的示图是为了防止复杂的相应修订。
20. 删除现在的5.3.1.2.1段并用新段 5.3.1.2.1 替换如下：
"5.3.1.2.1 除5.3.1.2.2 规定的第7 类揭示牌外，揭示牌必须如图 5.3.0所示。
图 5.3.0
揭示牌 (第7类除外)
揭示牌应该是一个呈45度角的正方形(菱形) ，4条边长相同。最小尺寸为 250 mm x 250 mm (至揭示牌外部边缘) 且内部形成菱形的最小线宽应为5 mm。内有一条与边缘平行的线并从线外部测量距离揭示牌边缘12.5 mm。符号和边缘内线的颜色应与所运危险货物类别或项别标签的颜色一致。类号或项号的符号/数字应与5.2.2.2所描述的相应危险货物类号或项号的大小和位置成比例。按5.2.2.2 对相应标签规定的方式，揭示牌应标明所运危险货物的类号或项号(第1 类货物还应标明配装组字母)，数字高度不小于25 mm。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。”
提议7
21. 删除5.3.1.2.1段并替换新段5.3.1.2.1如下：
“5.3.1.2.1 除了如5.3.1.2.2中的第7类揭示牌，揭示牌应符合5.2.2.2.1和 5.2.2.2.2对于危险货物类别或项别的标签条款，除了：
(a) 最小尺寸应为 250 mm x 250 mm (至揭示牌外部边缘) 且内部形成菱形的最小线宽应为5 mm。内有一条与边缘平行的线并从线外部测量距离揭示牌边缘12.5 mm (外部)。
(b) 所运危险货物的类号或项号(第1 类货物还应标明配装组字母)，数字高度应不小于25 mm。”
22. 作为相应修订，5.3.1.1.2的最后一句可删除，因为它和5.3.1.2.1 中引用的5.2.2.2.1的文本重复。
提议8：高温物质标记
23. 在 5.3.2.2中， 修订文本如下：
“5.3.2.2 高温物质
运输或提交运输的货物运输装置，如装有温度等于或高于100℃的液态物质，或温度等于或高于240℃的固态物质，必须在每一侧面和每一端面贴有如图5.3.4 所示的标记。
图 5.3.4
高温运输的标记
标记应为三边等长的等边三角形。标记颜色为红色。每边最小尺寸应为250 mm。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。”
提议9: 中型散货箱和大型包装堆放装载符号
24. 堆放装载符号的提议是要明确印刷标记区域应为正方形。这将保证符号保持比例。对于印刷标记没有印刷在中型散货箱和大型包装上的情况，符号要求应与所示样图成比例而给出了所需最小尺寸为100 mm的指标。从实际的角度来看，当印刷符号没有印刷标记时，印刷商能灵活增加所用的尺寸来确保标记足够大。由于涉及的问题复杂，英国不愿确定符号本身的尺寸。这也将改变“规章范本”第17修订版的最新采纳的方法。
25. 修订 6.5.2.2.2如下：
"6.5.2.2.2 中型散货箱在使用中允许堆放的最大承重须显示在如图 6.5.1 或图 6.5.2所示的符号上。标记应耐用且清晰可见。
图 6.5.1 图 6.5.2
可堆放的中型散货箱 不可堆放的中型散货箱
最小尺寸应为 100 mm x 100 mm。标明重量的字母和数字高度至少应为12 mm。印刷标记区域应为正方形。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。”
26. 修订6.6.3.3.3 如下：
"6.6.3.3 大型包装在使用中允许堆放的最大承重须显示在如图 6.6.1 或图 6.6.2所示的符号上。标记应耐用且清晰可见
图 6.6.1 图 6.6.2
可堆放的大型包装 不可堆放的大型包装
最小尺寸应为100 mmx 100 mm。标明重量的字母和数字高度至少应为12 mm。印刷标记的区域应为正方形。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。符号上方标记的重量不得超过设计型式试验(见6.6.5.3.3.4)中规定的载荷除以1.8。
注: 从2015年1月起，6.6.3.3条款应适用于所有大型包装的生产、修理及再生产。”
提议10：包装说明P650和P904中的标记
27. 修订P650中图示如下(图片的整体尺寸增加到可允许字母/箭头的尺寸大小)：
28. 修订P904中图示如下(图片的整体尺寸增加到可允许字母/箭头的尺寸大小)：
提议11：熏蒸警告标识
29. 熏蒸警告标识已有尺寸箭头。本提议将对标识的描述文字与其他标识保持一致。线宽描述同有限数量标识的规定。
30. 修订5.5.2.3.2 和图5.5.1如下：
“5.5.2.3.2 熏蒸警告标识如图5.5.1所示：
图5.5.1
* 填入适当的具体细节：
熏蒸警告标识
该标识应为矩形。最小尺寸为宽度300mm×高度250mm，边框线的最小宽度为2mm。标识为白底黑字且字体高度不小于25mm。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。”
提议12：冷却剂/调节装置警告标识
31. 为了字体清晰紧凑，正式运输名称只能写成一行。写在下面的文字“冷却剂/调节装置”也是如此。
32. 本文提议改变5.5.2的插图，即通过增大词“警告”的尺寸以使之与总的尺寸大小成比例。并且在底端角落里加入印刷标记使其更加清楚。尺寸箭头旁使用的文字与该文本中的其它提议相一致。5.5.3.6.2段重新组织以与本提案中熏蒸警告标识相一致。
33. 删除现在的5.5.3.6.2段，用新的5.5.3.6.2段替换如下：
“5.5.3.6.2 警告标识应如图5.5.2所示
图 5.5.2
货物运输单元中冷却剂/调节装置的警告标识
* 插入冷却剂/调节装置的正式运输名称，字母必须大写，排成一行且字体高度不小于25mm。如果运输名称过长，无法写入提供的空白处，那么字体大小应调整到可适应标识尺寸的最大字体。如：二氧化碳，固体。
** 按实际情况插入“作为冷却剂”“作为调节装置”字样。字母必须大写，排成一行且字体高度至少为25mm。
该标识必须为矩形，最小尺寸为宽度150mm×高度250mm。“警告”字体必须为红色或者白色，且字体高度至少为25mm。如未规定尺寸，所有特征应大概与图示成比例。”
过渡措施
34. 英国专家同意需要长的过渡期来消耗现存标记的存量。英国认为对规章范本的相关申请来说过渡期到2017年1月1日是合适的。然而，英国并不坚持具体的日期。
指导原则
35. 英国专家在41次会议上收到对规章范本的指导原则增加文本的支持。如果本文件的提议被采纳，则英国专家将准备在以后的会议中提出提议文本。